Calculator

Estimate Your DORA Compliance Savings

Enter your organisation's details below. The calculator estimates the efficiency gains from replacing manual compliance activities with an automated platform, based on industry benchmarks from financial entities across the EU.

Total headcount
Providers in your Register of Information
Staff hours spent on DORA activities
Fully loaded cost per compliance hour
ICT-related incidents requiring reporting
Critical or important functions registered

Your Estimated ROI

Based on industry benchmarks for automated DORA compliance platforms.

Time savings
--
hours saved per month
Cost savings
€--
estimated annual savings
Risk reduction
--%
fewer compliance gaps
Payback period
--
months to positive ROI

Get a Detailed ROI Report

Receive a personalised PDF report with a detailed breakdown of your projected savings, implementation timeline, and compliance roadmap.

Thank you. Your personalised ROI report will be sent to your email shortly.
Please enter your name and a valid work email address.

Methodology

How We Calculate Your Savings

The ROI estimates are based on aggregated data from financial entities that have transitioned from manual to automated DORA compliance workflows. The key assumptions behind the calculation:

Time reduction (60-70%). Automated evidence collection, risk scoring, and regulatory reporting typically reduce manual compliance effort by 60-70%. The exact reduction depends on organisation complexity and the number of ICT providers managed. Organisations with more providers see higher time savings due to the automation of Register of Information maintenance and vendor questionnaire management.

Incident cost reduction. Each reportable ICT incident carries direct costs (investigation, remediation, reporting) and indirect costs (regulatory scrutiny, reputational impact). Automated monitoring and classification reduce both the frequency of compliance-related incidents and the time to detect and respond to those that do occur. We estimate a 35-45% reduction in incident-related compliance costs.

Platform cost assumption. The payback calculation assumes an annual platform cost that scales with organisation size. The actual cost of DORA GRC depends on your specific deployment and is typically agreed during a tailored demo.


FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

DORA compliance costs vary widely depending on organisation size, complexity, and current maturity. Small financial entities may spend between EUR 50,000 and EUR 200,000 annually on manual compliance activities including staff time, external consultants, and audit preparation. Larger institutions can spend significantly more. Automated compliance platforms typically reduce these costs by 50-70% by eliminating manual evidence gathering, automating risk assessments, and streamlining regulatory reporting.

Most organisations see a positive return on investment within 3-6 months of implementing DORA compliance software. The payback period depends on the volume of manual compliance work being replaced, the number of ICT providers being managed, and the frequency of regulatory reporting. Organisations with 50+ ICT providers or 100+ hours of monthly manual compliance work typically achieve payback within the first quarter.

Automated DORA compliance reduces risk in several ways: continuous monitoring catches control gaps before they become incidents, automated evidence collection ensures audit readiness at all times, real-time dashboards provide management with accurate risk visibility, and standardised processes reduce human error in risk assessments and incident classification. Organisations using automated compliance platforms typically report significantly fewer compliance-related incidents and faster incident response times.

The highest-ROI areas for DORA automation are: Register of Information maintenance (Art. 28), which requires ongoing data collection from all ICT providers; incident classification and reporting (Art. 17-23), where automated workflows help meet the 4-hour initial notification deadline; risk assessment and control mapping (Art. 6-8), which benefits from standardised frameworks and automated scoring; and resilience testing documentation (Art. 24-27), where automated evidence collection reduces preparation time significantly.